In order to comply with governmental regulations and to simplify the review process, the IACUC has established a policy on the ability to use the Designated Member Review (DMR) on new protocol submissions.
1. New protocols will be reviewed by the IACUC coordinator to see if they meet the review criteria for a DMR protocol. (Table 1)
2. If a protocol meets these criteria, it will generally be assigned a primary (scientific), a veterinary, a safety reviewer, and a regulatory reviewer. These individuals will act as agents of the IACUC and can require and perform any function of the IACUC with the sole exception of withholding approval of a protocol. Only a full committee vote may do that.
3. All members of the committee will be assigned in Topaz as a “Call for FCR or not” reviewer to allow for a call for a full committee review by the specified deadline. In addition, primary reviewers will be assigned in Topaz as “Primary review” with a deadline for review.
4. If no one calls for a FCR, then the primary reviewers will complete the review. The review will be sent via Topaz to the Principal Investigator for any required changes. The subsequent DMR review process is the same as a FCR review process.
5. 3-year renewals will be processed as DMR regardless of pain category and species used.
Exceptions require the approval of the IACUC Chair.
Table 1: Criteria for Designated Member Review versus Full Committee Review
|Designated Member Review (DMR)||Full Committee Review (FCR)|
|Pain/Distress Level||B and/or C||D and/or E|
|Species||Non-USDA regulated||USDA regulated|
Effective Dates: July 27, 2017 through June 30, 2020
This policy has been approved by a majority vote of the Animal Care Committee members.
Joseph Lorenzo, M.D., Chair, Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee