uconn health

Salaries

  • A 3% annual increase should be applied to salary for all personnel for each budget period.

DHHS Salary Cap

Effective January 1, 2025, the DHHS salary limitation for Executive Level 2 was increased to $225,700. For additional information, please refer to NIH Notice: NOT-OD-25-085.  Note that this salary cap applies to all DHHS agencies.

Graduate Assistants

The graduate assistant stipend for UConn Health students is $34,000.  If applying for an individual fellowship or training grant from NIH, refer to the NRSA requirements for stipend, tuition, and institutional allowance.

Post-Doctoral Stipends

  • Below are the current National Research Service Award (NRSA) Post Doctoral stipend levels that should be taken into consideration when preparing your proposal budget. These stipend levels must be used when applying to the NRSA for support. Current stipend levels can also be found on the NIH website.
  • Use of the stipend level which is consistent with the intended postdoctoral years of experience is recommended for use with other support sources.

 

Years of Experience

Stipend

0

$61,008

1

$61,428

2

$61,884

3

$59,592

4

$64,356

5

$68,964

6

$71,532

7+

$74,088

 

 

Proposal Responsibilities

The development and assembly of the various components of the proposal as well as complying with sponsor and institutional requirements is a shared relationship between the Principal Investigator, their academic unit and Dean’s office, and the Sponsored Program Services. The following chart summarizes the distribution of responsibilities.

 

Proposal Preparation Responsibility PI/Dept. Dept. Head/ Dean/ Director/ VPR SPS
Identifies appropriate funding opportunities

X

Reads proposal solicitation for requirements

X

Prepares full proposal as required by the sponsor (including all sponsor required forms)

X

Requests and documents approval and certification for Cost Share

X

X

Completes Internal Proposal Review form (IPR) and Cost Share Approval form as appropriate and routes form(s) for signatures

X

Completes significant financial interest disclosure form (SFID) and routes to Sponsored Program Services

X

Develops budget and justification to accomplish proposed scope of work

X

Provides initial proposal elements to SPS no later than 5 business days in advance of sponsor deadline (minimum requirements to initiate review: Completed internal forms, proposal guidelines, itemized budget, detailed budget justification)

X

Revises and corrects proposal after SPS review; provides revised/corrected documents to Pre-Award Services

X

Works with the Purchasing Office to develop Small Business/Minority Subcontracting Plan if required

X

 

Review and Approval Responsibility PI/Dept. Dept. Head/ Dean/ Director/ VPR SPS
Assures proposed project is appropriate and consistent with departmental and institutional mission

X

Assures proposed project has qualified personnel and adequate space

X

Indicates approval of draft proposal by signing IPRF Certifications

X

Approves and certifies Cost Share for the Department, School or College

X

Reviews IPRF for content and completion

X

Reviews SFID and forwards for further inquiry/action if appropriate

X

Evaluates and approves required and voluntary Cost Share for the University

X

Reviews budget for appropriate Salaries, Fringe Benefits, Tuition, Indirect/F&A, and projected escalations; checks calculations for accuracy

X

Reviews initial proposal elements and requests outstanding documents

X

Reviews proposal for compliance with sponsor requirements and provides feedback

X

Approves proposal, serves as authorized signatory and institutional representative

X

 

Submission and Post-Submission Responsibility PI/Dept. Dept. Head/ Dean/ Director/ VPR SPS
Submits approved hardcopy (paper) proposal to sponsor. Submits approved electronic proposal if sponsor allows e-submisson by PI/Dept.

X

Submits approved electronic proposal to sponsor if sponsor requires e-submission by institutional representative

X

Submits Small Business/Minority Subcontracting Plan

X

Maintains proposal pending files and database

X

Prepares Post-Submission Sponsor Request materials (Just-In-Time information, revised budgets, additional forms, etc.) and submits to SPS

X

Reviews Post-Submission Sponsor Request materials, provides feedback, submits final materials to sponsor

X

 

Revised 01/24/2024

Proposal Review Procedures and Policy

Proposal Review Process

  1. The Sponsored Program Services (SPS) Pre-Award Administrative Program Coordinator compiles the proposal materials and date/time stamps as received.
  2. In order of receipt, the SPS Pre-Award Administrative Program Coordinator enters the proposal information into InfoEd and forwards to the Pre-Award Project Officer.
  3. The SPS Pre-Award Project Officer reviews the proposal materials to ensure compliance with institutional and sponsor policies.
  4. When the proposal review has been completed, the SPS Pre-Award Project Officer informs the principal investigator and/or department administrator of any changes to be made.  It is the responsibility of the principal investigator and/or department administrator to make the changes.
  5. The SPS Pre-Award Project Officer forwards the proposal to the University’s authorized representative for review, approval and signature.
  6. For paper proposals or electronic submissions by the principal investigator, SPS returns the signed forms to the principal investigator or department administrator.  It is the responsibility of the principal investigator or department administrator to submit the final proposal to the sponsor.  A full copy of the proposal should be forwarded to SPS.
  7. For electronic submissions by SPS, the Pre-Award Project Officer submits the final proposal to the sponsor.  A full copy of the proposal is uploaded and is accessible to the principal investigator and department administrator via InfoEd.
  8. The PI and/or department administrator should monitor submission of the proposal through sponsor acceptance of the proposal for review.  This can be done via e-mail from Grants.gov or directly from the sponsor.   If there are errors requiring correction, the PI and/or department administrator makes the necessary corrections and contacts SPS to resubmit.

Proposal Review Requirements

All administrative components of a proposal are due to SPS no later than 5 business days prior to the agency deadline and all scientific components (submission-ready proposal)  are due to SPS by noon the day before the sponsor deadline.  This is in accordance with the Proposal Submission Policy and Due Dates.  This allows SPS to review the proposal thoroughly and identify problems that need to be addressed, as well as allow you ample time to finalize the proposal.

See Proposal Submission Policy and Due Dates

All proposals must be routed through SPS for review and approval prior to submitting to the sponsor to ensure compliance with University, Federal, State, and Sponsor policies and procedures.  Pre-proposals that require electronic submission by SPS, the signature of an authorized official or cost share must be routed through SPS.  If a detailed budget is a requirement of the pre-proposal, it is recommended that the pre-proposal is also routed through SPS. The routing process is not completed until the authorized official in SPS has signed the proposal.

Submissions made prior to approval from SPS are not officially approved and may be administratively withdrawn if the submission is found to be non-compliant with University or agency requirements. If you have submitted a proposal without SPS review, please notify us immediately so we can work with you to route your proposal for the necessary approvals.

Proposal Submission Requirements

The following should be submitted to SPS 5 business days prior to the sponsor deadline:

  • Completed  Internal Proposal Review Form (Reminder: Due date must be entered or write “No Due Date” if there is no due date)
  • Proposal Guidelines from Sponsoring Agency
  • Draft of Proposal Science Documents (i.e. summary, narrative, references)
  • Budget and Budget Justification
  • Cost Sharing Details and Approvals, if applicable
  • Subrecipients:  Approved Scope of Work, Budget, Budget Justification, F&A Rate Agreement and signed Information and Compliance Form
  • Completed Electronic application, if applicable (final science documents should be provided by noon the day prior to sponsor deadline)

Pre-Proposal Submission Requirements

The following should be submitted to SPS 5 business days prior to the sponsor deadline for pre-proposals, Letters of Intent requiring institutional signatory:

  • Completed IPAS form
  • Proposal Guidelines from Sponsoring Agency
  • Draft of Proposal Science (i.e. summary, narrative, references)
  • Budget and Budget Justification
  • Pdf of draft application

For assistance with preparing your proposal and meeting requirements, please refer to the Proposal Preparation Checklist

If the proposed research involves the use of human subjects, animal subjects, embryonic stem cells, recombinant DNA, or biohazards, Research Compliance Services can assist you in obtaining appropriate review and approval.

Proposal Submission Due Dates

The following proposal submission due dates allow SPS sufficient time to review the proposal thoroughly, identify necessary corrections and make appropriate recommendations.  The review timeframe allows PIs ample time to finalize the proposal prior to submission to sponsors.

Items Required for Submission to SPS SPS Due Date (# of business days prior to sponsor due date)
Proposal Review Materials for all proposals, including electronic (see Proposal Preparation Checklist for specific requirements) 5 Full Business Days
Electronic Submission (ready to submit) noon day prior to sponsor deadline

Five (5) Business Days Prior to the Sponsor Due Date

Forward Proposal Review Materials to SPS for review.

  • The PI/Dept. should forward the proposal review materials to SPS five (5) business days prior to the due date. The proposal materials should be emailed (sps@uchc.edu).

Noon Day Prior to the Sponsor Due Date

Release Electronic Application with final Science Documents to SPS for Submission to the Sponsor.

  • The PI /Dept. should release the final application to SPS noon the day prior to the due date for electronic submission to the sponsor. This allows time for final review and for submittal several hours in advance to minimize possible technology problems and maximize time for corrections in response to system errors indicated by Grants.gov (or other electronic systems).

Late Submission for SPS Due Dates

If proposal materials are not received in SPS by the internal due dates, the proposal is considered late. The proposal is added to the queue and is processed in the order it was received. The PI assumes the risk that there may be insufficient time for adequate proposal review, that he/she may need to correct errors in the electronic submission, and that the sponsor deadline may be missed.

 Proposal Submission on Days that the University has an Unscheduled Closing Due to Inclement Weather

When the University is closed due to inclement weather in accordance with the University’s Emergency Closing Policy, the Pre-Award Team is available to submit proposals due that day. It is at the discretion of the PI whether or not to submit or seek an extension from the sponsor as the University is closed.   Please copy sps@uchc.edu on the extension request, if applicable.  Generally, the decision to accept a late submission is made by the sponsor on a case by case basis.  Please refer to the sponsor’s specific policies on late submissions due to inclement weather.

PI Eligibility

Faculty automatically eligible to serve as Principal Investigator or Co-Investigator:

  • Emeritus Faculty
  • University Professor
  • Professor
  • Associate Professor
  • Assistant Professor
  • Research Professor
  • Associate Research Professor
  • Assistant Research Professor
  • Professor-in-Residence
  • Associate Professor-in-Residence
  • Assistant Professor-in-Residence
  • Research Scientist
  • Research Scholar
  • Extension Educator

Professional staff normally eligible to serve as Principal Investigator or Co-Investigator:

  • Dean
  • Associate or Assistant Dean
  • Director
  • Associate or Assistant Director
  • Extension Professor
  • Associate or Assistant Extension Professor
  • Curator
  • Program Director
  • Selected University Staff Professionals, Specialists, and Educational Assistants

Employees normally considered ineligible to serve as Principal Investigator or Co-Investigator:

  • Instructor
  • Assistant Instructor
  • Lecturer
  • Post-Doctoral Appointees
  • Research Associates, Assistants and Fellows
  • Visiting and Other Short-Term Appointees

In special cases, exceptions may be made. These special cases require the Request for Approval to Serve as Principal Investigator Form be completed by the PI Applicant, signed by the PI Applicant, Faculty Sponsor, Department Head and/or Dean and submitted to SPS for review prior to proposal submission. A Curriculum Vitae should be attached.

For additional information, please refer to the University’s policy on Eligibility for Principal Investigator Status.

Tools and Resources

The following websites have information that is informative and valuable to Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee members and the researchers who use laboratory animals.

IACUC Administrator’s Association
American College of Laboratory Animal Medicine Position on Medical Records for Animals Used in Research, Teaching, and Testing
American Association for Laboratory Animal Science
Animal Inspection Reports – Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
Animal Welfare Information Center
Association for the Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International (AAALAC)
Congressional Research Service Report for Congress on the Animal Welfare Act (PDF)
Ethics of Research Involving Animals – Nuffield Bioethics
Experimental Design Assistant
Johns Hopkins Center for the Alternatives to Animal Testing
Laboratory Animal Welfare Training Exchange
Laboratory Primate Newsletter
Newcastle Consensus Meeting on Carbon Dioxide Euthanasia of Laboratory Animals (PDF)
National Institutes of Health (NIH) Guidelines for Rodent Survival Surgery
Public Health Service (PHS) Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW)
Public Health Service (PHS) OLAW FAQ Website
USDA/APHIS Animal Care
USDA Environmental Enrichment for Nonhuman Primates Resource Guide

 

Resources Related to Contracts

OCTR Procedures for School of Dental Medicine

Laptop with Two PersonsThe purpose of the OCTR as it relates to the School of Dental Medicine clinical research/clinical trials do not change from our overall goal for researchers in the School of Medicine. Our goal is to provide clinical researchers administrative assistance with the following tasks:

  • Contract and clinical trial budget negotiations
  • Fiscal set up and oversight of Banner research accounts including account reconciliation and closeout
  • Development of viable study budgets
  • Identification of studies that qualify for Medicare reimbursement, as “qualifying clinical trials”
  • Identification of research subjects and research charges, through quality monitoring and audit, to assure research financial compliance

The Budget Workbook is used to standardize the research budget process. It provides accurate study budget calculations for clinical trials, regardless of the sponsor.

Some Helpful Information

  • School of Dental Policies supporting OCTR procedures can be found below
  • Flow charts that provide a visual representation of the dental procedures are available and each flow chart is followed by a companion narrative description
Procedure Title Description
OCTR Process Overview Understanding the Overall Process of the OCTR
Dental Procedure I Flow Sheet Dental Budget Process: Determination Schema Industry Sponsored, Industry Supported, University to University,
Co-operative Group or Foundation Supported Clinical Trials
Dental Procedure I Narrative Following Flow Sheet Dental Budget Process: Determination Schema Industry Sponsored, Industry Supported, University to University,
Co-operative Group or Foundation Supported Clinical Trials
Dental Procedure I.a Flow Sheet Dental Budget Process: Determination Schema Federal or Awards in Response to a Public Solicitation
Dental Procedure I.a Narrative Following Flow Sheet Dental Budget Process: Determination Schema Federal or Awards in Response to a Public Solicitation
Dental Procedure II Flow Sheet Registering Dental Clinical Trial
Dental Procedure II Narrative Following Flow Sheet Registering Dental Clinical Trial

 

OCTR Policies

Institutional Policies

Policy Number Policy Title
2006-06 Evaluation of a Clinical Research Trial for Medicare Reimbursement Download File >
2006-07 Clinical Research Trials Budget Review Download File >

 

2024-02 Clinical Trials and Research Billing Compliance Download File >
2006-10 Reconciliation of Research Accounts Download File >
2006-11 Contract Negotiations for Initiation of Clinical Research and/or Clinical Trials Negotiated by Staff in the Office of Clinical & Translational Research Download File >
2006-13 Health Insurance Coverage for Cancer Clinical Trials in Connecticut Download File >
2007-06 Clinical Trials Under Contract – Administrative Requirements Download File >

 

School of Dental Medicine Policies

Policy Number Policy Title
2012-1 Dental Clinical Research/Trials Budget Review and Exemption, October 31, 2012 Download File >
2012-2 Dental Clinical Research/Discounts for Investigator-Initiated Research, October 31, 2012 Download File >
2012-3 Dental Clinical Research/Discounts for Industry Sponsored Research, October 31, 2012 Download File >
2012-4 Dental Clinical Research/Routing Process, October 31, 2012 Download File >

 

Health and Safety Policy Statement

UConn Health is committed to providing a safe and healthy environment for all activities under the jurisdiction of the University.

The health and safety of all faculty, staff, students and visitors shall be a principle consideration in the planning, operation and conduct of all University activities and programs.  As part of its responsibilities, UConn Health makes safety expertise and services available to all its programs through departments such as Environmental Health and Safety, Police, Facilities Management, and Employee Health Services. Faculty and staff provide oversight of safety and environmental protection activities through committees such as the Institutional Review Board, the Animal Care Committee, Hospital Safety and Disaster Planning Committee, and the Hospital Infection Control Committee. Institutional Safety Policies and Guidelines on special issues outline procedures to be followed by everyone.

The following statements are intended to highlight selected minimum safety principles. All faculty, staff, and students are expected to know and comply with these precepts.

General

  • Safety is everyone’s responsibility and cannot be delegated!
  • All employees are expected to carry out their assignments in a way that prevents injury to themselves and others.
  • Faculty and all employees must set personal examples of safety for their students and other employees. The UConn Health’s Rules of Conduct must be followed.
  • Faculty and staff must be alert to recognizing and resolving potential safety and environmental hazards so that risks for employees, students, volunteers and visitors are identified and reduced or eliminated.
  • Supervisors and employees must establish, follow, and enforce safe practices and procedures.
  • In research, principal investigators have a key role in establishing and enforcing safe practices and procedures.
  • Every individual must know the potential hazards associated with their duties and follow all applicable safety practices and procedures.
  • Disciplinary action up to and including termination may be appropriate for failure to comply with or follow required safety procedures/policies.

Training

  • Mandatory training is a key component of many safety efforts.
  • Management at all levels MUST enforce attendance at appropriate training sessions (Laboratory Safety, Radiation Safety, General Chemical Safety, Universal Precautions, Humane Care and Use of Animals, etc.).
  • Supervisors are responsible for having their employees attend required training.
  • Supervisors/Principal Investigators MUST provide information to their employees and students on the specific hazards associated with their activities and the safety procedures to be followed.

Enforcement

  • Violations of this policy and/or subordinate Health & Safety policies, programs or procedures may result in disciplinary measures in accordance with University Laws and By-Laws, applicable bargaining agreements and the University Student Conduct Code.

Emergencies

For emergency assistance (Police, Fire, Medical) on the main campus and on all the off-sites locations dial “911”.  For a medical code in the main hospital (Farmington) requiring a rapid response team dial “7777”.

Accident/Incident Reporting

  • Employee Health Service will provide for the initial medical management of occupational injuries and illnesses. When Employee Health Service is not open (nights, weekends or holidays) or when the injury may require the resources of the Emergency Department, employees can report to the Emergency Department or to an approved in-network initial treatment provider.
  • Occupational injuries and illnesses of employees and students must be promptly reported by the employee to their supervisor and together they must report the accident/incident to Gallagher Bassett 1-800-828-2717 (State of Connecticut’s Worker’s Compensation third party administrator) regardless of severity. For each employee accident/incident, the supervisor will complete the “First Report of Injury” WC-207 form. Supervisors are responsible for evaluating such reports and taking prompt action.
  • Human Resources and/or Environmental Health and Safety will review each injury and illness report and coordinate the incident with the supervisor for their investigation/action. Human Resources is responsible for maintaining the Institution’s OSHA log of such incidents.

Hazard Reporting

It is the responsibility of every employee to report unsafe conditions to their supervisor or the supervisor having responsibility for the area. Unsafe conditions not promptly corrected will be reported in writing using the attached form which must also be sent to the appropriate supervisor and Environmental Health and Safety (MC 1514).

Oversight

All activities are encouraged to have their own programs that further emphasize safety and assist in ensuring a safe environment, regulatory compliance, accreditation, etc.  During each employee’s performance evaluation the supervisor needs to consider the individual’s adherence to prescribed safety responsibilities.

Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S)

EH&S is charged with implementing all University health and safety policies and procedures* in the Biological, Chemical and Radiation health and safety fields. EH&S has been authorized by, and is accountable to the University President, Hospital Chief Executive Officer and Senior University Management to identify, assess and enforce this Health and Safety policy and subordinate health and safety regulations, policies and procedures.

EH&S is responsible for maintaining a comprehensive program that combines training, consultation, control, and inspection to protect the health and safety of all personnel in the course of University sanctioned activities.  EH&S staff provides professional services to measure and evaluate hazards to which the University community may be exposed and ensure compliance with regulations and University policies.  EH&S’s responsibilities include:

  • Ensure that all written policies, procedures, and training materials for applicable health and safety regulatory standards are established, current, and available for delivery to appropriate campus groups;
  • Maintain an up-to-date webpage to enhance access to health and safety policies, procedures, technical guidance documents, and compliance assistance information;
  • Facilitate health and safety communications with the University community, and stress the importance of campus wide adherence to appropriate regulations, standards and policies;
  • Provide inspection services to laboratory settings to enhance campus health and safety; and facilitate timely correction of identified non-compliances through escalating notification and enforcement;
  • Promote EH&S’s role as an environmental, health and safety information resource ready to meet the needs of the campus community; and
  • Take appropriate measures (including Stop Work Authority for imminent hazard situations) to maintain acceptable margins of safety and regulatory compliance over all University operations.

Special Topics

  • UConn Health’s Policy for the Control of Employee Occupational Exposure to Bloodborne Pathogens (OEBP) and Exposure Control Plan prescribes safety procedures that must be followed to reduce the risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens. Guidelines for the Conduct of Activities with Biohazardous Materials at UConn Health are also applicable, especially to laboratory activities.
  • Research involving recombinant DNA molecules must follow the guidelines of the National Institutes of Health referenced below.
  • Safety Data Sheets (SDSs) are used by manufacturers to provide health and safety information on chemicals and commercial products. SDSs are available to faculty, staff, and students through the Environmental Health and Safety homepage. Questions on SDSs and their interpretation should be referred to supervisors, PIs, and/or Environmental Health and Safety.
  • As a Connecticut State Agency, the Connecticut Occupational Safety and Health Regulations apply. These regulations are enforced by the CT Department of Labor, CT OSHA. Employees must comply with these regulations. For example:
    • Appropriate equipment guards must be used and maintained.
    • Work with chemicals, as appropriate, may require goggles or goggles and a face shield, gloves and/or an apron. Such protective equipment is available for purchase from the warehouse and will then be provided to the employee at no cost.
    • Employees using respirators for chemical protection must have it selected and fit tested by EH&S. The EH&S will also provide the required training and Employee Health Service will provide the required medical certification.
    • Potentially hazardous materials including compressed gases, flammable liquids, chemical reagents, infectious materials will be received and delivered by personnel trained in the potential hazard and appropriate emergency response.
    • Users of potentially hazardous materials will understand the potential hazards and ensure proper storage and labeling. Consistent with operational requirements, users are expected to minimize quantities kept in their area. Materials stored will be kept so as to prevent the contact of incompatibles and protected from breakage that could result from improper storage on unstable or overcrowded shelves.
    • Individuals will comply with established policies for the disposal of their hazardous materials (radioactive materials, chemicals, and regulated medical wastes).

Regulatory Inspections

  • Safety surveys or inspections by outside activities including regulatory agencies will be brought promptly to the attention of the offices indicated below to ensure proper coordination:
  • Nuclear Regulatory Commission – Radiation Safety Office (RSO) Environmental Protection Agency – Environmental Health and Safety
  • OSHA – Research Safety Office, CT Department of Energy and Environmental Protection – Environmental Health and Safety
  • CT Department of Public Safety or CT Fire Marshal’s Officials – Public Safety Office and Facilities Management
  • Building Code or Insurance Carriers – Facilities Management and Public Safety

Established Health Center Safety Policies and Guidelines Include

  • UConn Health Chemical Hygiene Plan for Occupational Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in the Laboratory
  • Policy for the Control of Employee Occupational Exposures to Bloodborne Pathogens (OEBP) and Exposure Control Plan
  • Regulated Medical Waste Disposal Policy
  • NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules
  • Chemical and Laboratory Safety Training Policy
  • Guidelines for the Disposal of Chemical Waste
  • Standards for the Handling of Compressed Gases in Cylinders
  • Guidelines for the Laboratory Use of Carcinogens
  • Chemical Hood Policy
  • Policy and Procedures, Permit Required Confined Spaces
  • Policy for the Control of Hazardous Energy (Lockout/Tagout)
  • Information and UConn Health Policies Governing the use of Controlled Substances in Laboratories
  • Small Children and Babies in the Workplace
  • Smoking Policy
  • Rules of Conduct

Focused Subject Matter Safety Committees

A number of safety committees reporting to the Associate Vice President for Research Integrity and Regulatory Affairs under the Vice President for Research have been established that address aspects of health and safety specific to research activities or focused subject matter.   These committees serve as advisory boards and research protocol review boards working in partnership with EH&S to fulfill University goals.

Environment of Care Safety Committee

Health & Safety Committee – Union

Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee

Institutional Biosafety Committee

Institutional Review Board

Laser Safety Committee

Radiation Safety Committee

Workers Compensation Health & Safety Committee

 

Return to Environmental Health and Safety Policies